FHA versus Conventional – FHA losing ground? maybe not

March 1, 2015 at 8:18 pm By

FHA is a home loan program insured by HUD and in 2008, about a year after the real estate and the economy as a whole took a downward turn and Private mortgage money virtually disappeared from the industry, FHA’s market share of all insured mortgages soared to about 72% . In 2009 FHA accounted for 25% all home loan originations.
Interestingly this trend has changed. In fact between 2010 and 2014 FHA’s market share fell by half when you measure in terms of total number of home units sold.

FHA versus conventional

mortgage insurance share

Two things happened in 2010 and 2011 which exacerbated this trend.
1/ Cash investors were pouring into the housing market.
2/ PMI for Conventional loans began to tackle higher Loan to values such as 95% and 97%
. . . and so homebuyers looked to loans other than FHA to purchase homes.

Comparing FHA as a mortgage insurance to other mortgage insurance/guarantee options including Conventional PMI and VA (VA has no annual mortgage insurance but offers loanguarantees), it’s clearly that as time passed between 2009 and 2014 FHA’s 1.35% per annum mortgage insurance was considered expensive. In 2014 the PMI companies were generally offering mortgage insurance at cheaper rates than FHA. But with Obama announcing a drop in FHA’s annual mortgage insurance in Jan 2015, things may bounce back for FHA. Let’s line up Conventional versus FHA financing for a 95% Loan-to-value home purchase of $300,000.

Here are the parameters we will use:
FICO score 680
Purchase price: $300,000
Dowmpayment: 5% (95% Loan to value) –Note: FHA loans can go to 96.5% but for this comparison we will use 95%.

Using a readily available Conventional interest rate of 3.875% (30yr fixed), Radian’s PMI calculator at Radian’s private Mortgage insurance calculator gives an annual PMI factor of 0.89%.  An FHA loan on the other hand was available at 3.5% (30yr fixed) and annual mortgage insurance factor of 0.8% . There are two disadvantages however with FHA however:

(1) FHA comes with a “one-time” Upfront Mortgage Insurance premium (UFMIP) of 1.75% that’s financed with the loan.  This

(2) FHA’s mortgage insurance is for the life of the loan unlike Conventional PMI which can generally be removed when an LTV of 78% is reached

Take a look at the payment and loan amount comparison below.  For many buyers, such as for example those who have Bankruptcies less than 4 yrs old, Conventional may not even be an option, Those buyers are forced to go FHA  . . but as you can see below, it may not be as bad if you can contend with the two disadvantages we just described. And here’s some good news for buyers. The UFMIP can eliminated by means of a slightly higher interest rate which produces sufficient Lender credit to ‘buy out’ the 1.75%. in that case the FHA loan amount becomes exactly 95% of $300,000.

fha or conventional whats better

Comments are closed.